The Hubble Deep Field: The Most Important Image Ever Taken

Last Updated on Sunday, 11 July 2010 01:24 Written by Administrator Sunday, 11 July 2010 01:24

In 2003, the Hubble Space Telescope took the image of a millenium, an image that shows our place in the universe. Anyone who understands what this image represents, is forever changed by it. How Can the universe be 78 billion LY across? I explain that in this article: www.deepastronomy.com There is also a link to a science paper on the topic, that paper actually states 96 billion LY. arxiv.org
Video Rating: 4 / 5

Share and Enjoy:

Related Reviews

Tags: Deep, Ever, Field, Hubble, Image, Important, Most, Taken

This entry was posted on Sunday, July 11th, 2010 at 1:24 pm and is filed under Telescope Videos. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

25 Comments

jhmoonman | Sunday, 11 July 2010 at 2:13 pm
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

At least,I think, we can establish,where,what direction, in the sky, the big bang came from!!???
JheakrynaKyAlur | Sunday, 11 July 2010 at 2:37 pm
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

@thimoneus
actually i doubt that there is anything useful produced and broadcasted on historychannel.
srsly…
i still know, the bigbang was about 15 mrd years back, and that the visible light can only have traveled that far.

but noone can see if the universe expands faster.
but thx for mentioning the Historychannel…
last time i saw a documentation on it that was actually history… it was… yet again… over hitlers doomsday devices….
to bad they don’t have any quality left
thimoneus | Sunday, 11 July 2010 at 3:37 pm
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

@lexmark136 The laws of science that exist outside of the realm of time and space and are therefore timeless/eternal.
thimoneus | Sunday, 11 July 2010 at 3:52 pm
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

@JheakrynaKyAlur They talked about the Hubble Deep Field on The Universe on the History Channel last night. They said that the most distant object in the image is about 13 billion light years away. That seems to make more sense.
funnybunny350 | Sunday, 11 July 2010 at 4:43 pm
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

fuck this made me realise just how small we are and some ppl thay they dnt belive in life on other planets lol show em this vid
academiccuriosity | Sunday, 11 July 2010 at 5:13 pm
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

@TheEchechech

thumbs up if you know how to use “you’re” correctly
BigEnos001 | Sunday, 11 July 2010 at 5:36 pm
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

@RajaBegun

And that’s kind of the problem that most of us run into with these issues sooner or later RajaBegun, because most of us aren’t theoretical physicists. I’m a designer by profession and so am naturally attuned to abstract visualisation, but I am certainly no advanced mathematician, so there are places that physicists can go to theoretically that I probably can’t. I suppose it then depends on who you trust and respect. It seems that both you and I have an above average interest though
BigEnos001 | Sunday, 11 July 2010 at 5:52 pm
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

@RajaBegun

Physicists often ‘visualise’ the universe as an expanding bubble. In this model, spacetime (the 4 dimensional limits of our perception) is analogous to the 2d surface of the bubble which is expanding in all directions, but not into an external volume (because it’s a surface). In this model, the bubble’s other 2 dimensions (from our 4d stance) would be analogous to extra dimensions beyond our ability to perceive or conceptualise and so you have to rely on applied mathematics alone.
RajaBegun | Sunday, 11 July 2010 at 6:51 pm
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

(3) PS: ))
Admitting that we no longer talk about our one-and-only universe as we know it – uni – and we hypothesise about a mulitverse or several pluriverses: hypothetically different pluriverses overlap, several different big bangs have been happening that do not affect our space-time reality because they each open different space-timelines when they implode…
The question about the not-yet-created, non-existent something into which this multiverse expands still remains …
RajaBegun | Sunday, 11 July 2010 at 7:05 pm
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

(2) PS: We said the universe is physical and therefore finite. Because the physical universe cannot be infinite. It turns out that that “yet uncreated matter” (passed the margin of this ever-expanding universe); the part where the unverse has not yet expanded into … plays a very important role and ought to be vital for this whole universe to exist. A kind of polarity like everything else in creation. We just don’t know what it is (or what it is not) for the time being.
RajaBegun | Sunday, 11 July 2010 at 7:27 pm
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

A philosophical question for tdarnell.

Let’s reduce the universe expansion at a scale so we can vizualize it. Say that after the big bang, the dot started expanding at inimaginable speeds. The dot became the size of a ping pong ball (reducing size dramatically so we stay visual) and now it keeps expanding and it is as big as i.e. a 6-foot sphere. The universe cannot be infinite because it is physical. What is that uncreated stuff beyond the sphere? What does this expanding sphere expand into?
lexmark136 | Sunday, 11 July 2010 at 7:49 pm
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

so riddle me this mothafuckas : where the fuck did all this shit come from?
KingWing777 | Sunday, 11 July 2010 at 7:59 pm
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

they should have prote’s voice from x-pax (Kevin Spacey) !
Nicklin30112 | Sunday, 11 July 2010 at 8:37 pm
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

good video, but the guys voice is annoying
BigEnos001 | Sunday, 11 July 2010 at 8:58 pm
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

@TuskenRaider80

No need.
TuskenRaider80 | Sunday, 11 July 2010 at 9:38 pm
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

@BigEnos001 mm nope just telling, nvm
BigEnos001 | Sunday, 11 July 2010 at 10:28 pm
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

@TuskenRaider80

Dude, I see the winking smiley face, but despite that, are you actually criticising me for attempting to answer somebody’s question (especially as I did encourage him to do some further reading, which he apparently didn’t want to do? You of course don’t have to like the answers or agree with them (perhaps you have different views) but cards on the table, are you looking to provoke an argument?
TuskenRaider80 | Sunday, 11 July 2010 at 11:17 pm
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

@BigEnos001 dude please, I think youve written enough here the uploader posted links to read about this.

infinity both outwards and inwards, and outside that? another dimension that isnt even possible to visualize. great..
Pomme843 | Monday, 12 July 2010 at 12:06 am
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

@fepv64 Dragostea din tei
BigEnos001 | Monday, 12 July 2010 at 12:58 am
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

@fepv64

I don’t where he got sultan(s) of swing from. If you mean the first piece it’s Shine on you crazy diamond (pts 1-7) by Pink Floyd. If you go to the end of the video though, the author credits the music used.
fepv64 | Monday, 12 July 2010 at 1:16 am
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

thank u!
JayLovePlaysGuitar | Monday, 12 July 2010 at 1:54 am
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

@fepv64 sultan of swing
fepv64 | Monday, 12 July 2010 at 2:42 am
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

whats the song’s name in this video?
fepv64 | Monday, 12 July 2010 at 3:34 am
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

what is the name of the song they use in this vid?
JheakrynaKyAlur | Monday, 12 July 2010 at 4:23 am
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

as it can have moved just beyond that…
and so we’ll most probably see it in…. well 1 bio years